won't get no peace with me

From a random profile, under the title "A Submissive's Bill of Rights":

You have the right to be treated with respect.
You have the right to be proud of what you are.
You have the right to feel safe.
You have the right to your emotions and feelings.
You have the right to express your negative feelings.
You have the right to say NO.
You have the right to expect happiness in life.
You have the right to have input in a relationship.
You have the right to belong.
You have the right to be loved and to love.
You have the right to be healthy.
You have the right to practice safe sex.
Anyone who doesn't agree to any of this? Isn't a good dominant, period.

(And before anyone chimes in about the 24/7 slaves that have 'slave bar codes' tattooed on the backs of their necks, or elsewhere, keep in mind that even that is negotiated beforehand. The only way anyone gets pulled into a BDSM relationship unwilling is when they're kidnapped and forced--and that's not what BDSM is about. The "masters" who do that are also generally arrested for doing so.) (BIIIIIIG warnings on that podcast link: NSFW to listen to openly, features graphic descriptions of serial murder, possibly up to and including playing the tapes found he used to torture his victims with. But there's a lot of wannabe 'masters' that have been arrested for kidnapping foreigners or illegals and keeping them in basements.)

In other news, I maintain that if you have to wear anything that says "SEXY", you're either insecure or deeply arrogant, and at least the latter is rarely attractive, or "sexy", in any way. (Link NSFW, mostly due to language.) Also, those heels go so far beyond stripper heels they're surreal. They're midway between drag queen balancing acts, and "hahahaha you're kidding" footwear.

Hells, most of the drag queens I know stop at six or seven inches for stilettos, and barely over that for wedges.

In other news...I have questions. This is not a mature body. That is a child. "A revolution in high definition realism"? Really? I'm so glad SL doesn't allow ageplay anymore.

Aren't you happier that ageplay is now banned? I know I am. I feel much safer knowing there's no Lolita fetishes, in the Nabokov sense, on SL. Don't you agree?

And of course, these tiny little girls need mature physics layers, right? Because of course they're full-grown adults, right? Because it's not like these kid avatars are shown in any sexualized way, right? And of course, none of these skins come with adult makeup, right?

Why hasn't this store been removed? Jesus Christ.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

1 Comments:

Anonymous said...

I would even be okay with the store if they didn't overtly sexualize the bodies. I don't mind people playing kids in SL, but seriously, this store is not catering to that market. Even Uti's stuff isn't this blatant.