But will they learn?
Apparently not.
Note, I'm not irked at that 'clarification' because I desire sex with or as a child. It's this passage that's making me see red:
We understand that in some cases there may be an element of subjectivity as to whether an avatar (or other image) appears to be a minor. Objective factors which will be used to decide include whether an avatar has child-like facial features, is sized as a child, has clothing or accessories generally associated with children, and whether, based on the circumstances, an avatar is speaking or acting like a child (e.g. "My Mommy says...").
Bold sections mine.
So much for my pixie, who is three feet tall, but is not a child. So much for my original doll, who is four feet tall but sized appropriately. So much for most of my doll outfits, which include pigtailed hair, Lolita dresses, Mary Jane shoes.
I am not a child! How dare they make me live in fear of losing my account like this?!?
There is going to be screaming over this one. Mark my words.
there'd be no doubt, only she's forgotten much more than she's lost
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 Comments:
I did notice the additional comment:
"...Please note it does not violate this policy merely to have a child-like avatar. It is not our intent to banish child-like avatars in and of themselves..."
I don't know if that helps specifically in your case, but I wasn't sure if you'd even caught it... *hugs*
Oh, I caught it. But they follow that *up* with the passage I quoted.
Which is very *specific* about the fact that, if the wrong person sees my pixie, or my shorter doll? That I could *lose everything*.
We're right back where we started, where child avatars are afraid to walk outside, where short avatars are afraid to act in affectionate ways with more adult-sized ones....
It. Is. UNFAIR. That for the actions of a few idiots, the rest of us have to self-censor to the point of ridiculousness!
Post a Comment