tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2135301473915671680.post7977071680813323198..comments2023-12-14T18:17:52.957-08:00Comments on The Train Wreck Love Life: because there's a story that ought to be heardEmilly Orrhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07245643246821826101noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2135301473915671680.post-3047830204822642652011-07-02T00:27:35.597-07:002011-07-02T00:27:35.597-07:00They were depicted as young girls, not children, b...They were depicted as young girls, not children, but even so--if they look underage, and engage in sexual activity, or are even presented sexually--it's child porn to Canada.Emilly Orrhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07245643246821826101noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2135301473915671680.post-69214721553572931102011-07-02T00:13:13.663-07:002011-07-02T00:13:13.663-07:00People will always overreact. e.e; Though Lost Gir...People will always overreact. e.e; Though Lost Girls was pretty extreme, I remember selling it at the comic store and we got..hnn 3 copies? That is an expensive book normal retail value of over $100. And those things sold out within the first couple hours of them hitting the shelf. If memory serves in that series they were young ladies, not children like...I wanna says 20s+ or so? I don't even remember but jeez people. I wish people would be more accepting of just art. If the painting of Venus was a bit younger, would it still be considered porn? Who knows; and not to come off as completely rude - but I bet people have fapped to it anyway.Serenity Semplehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11911695658722261308noreply@blogger.com